JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 17, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Naranjo Martinez Jeanneth·Respondent Consejo Superior De La Judicatura

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Audiencia Publica En La Accion De Tutela De Convocatoria A Concurso De Meritos.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recusacion
  • Alcance de aplicación de las causales
  • Sólo Procurador y actores pueden proponerla
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

No se aceptó la recusación formulada por los accionantes en contra el Magistrado Alejandro Martínez Caballero, para participar en el estudio y decisión sobre la constitucionalidad de los apartes acusados del Art. 1º del Acto Legislativo No. 1 de 1997, “Por el cual se modifica el Art. 35 de la Constitución Política”.

Lo anterior, según argumentó la Corte porque no se configura la causal de recusación alegada, ni ninguna otra de las legalmente previstas.

Se ordenó levantar la suspensión de términos y continuar el trámite del proceso de constitucionalidad de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. No aceptar la recusacion formulada por los ciudadanos Claudia Blum de Barberi y Luis Guillermo Giraldo Hurtado en contra del h. Magistrado Alejandro Martinez Caballero, para participar en el estudio y decision sobre la constitucionalidad de los apartes acusados del articulo 1o del Acto Legislativo No. 1 de 1997, "Por el cual se modifica el articulo 35 de la Constitucion Politica"
  2. Segundo. Levantar la suspension de terminos y continuar el tramite del proceso de constitucionalidad de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceVladimiro Naranjo MesaConcurrenceHernando Herrera Vergara
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.